And that California Evidence essay too? I thought they retired those subjects!
Okay, well, maybe not Evidence, but Civ Pro?!? Not that I wasn't ready for it, you understand. Not really. But I might have been just a little put off by the fact that they were in Federal District Court, with all parties being residents of the same state, under diversity jurisdiction (!), and the defendant wanting to change venue to another District Court in the same state?
Odd, that is. I don't think I've ever seen that fact pattern anywhere before. Ever.
Oh well... Onwards and upwards, as they say.
They do still say that, don't they?